|
Richard Quinney. Public
Menace

Richard Quinney was director
of public prosecutions throughout most of this process.
Quinney died during the spring
of 2003. His testimony was recorded in the discovery process
for the civil trial. We are also told that Ellen Gunn, now a
judge, was the director of public prosecutions during the time
the Klassens and Kvellos were charged and then had the charges
stayed.
If you are not familiar with
this story, a good starting point would be Scandal
of the Century where you will find the original news reports
and the beginnings of this case. The actions of Quinney in instructing
his prosecutors to proceed with this case and try and get convictions
despite evidence to the contrary are confirmed in an interview
with Matt Miazga in Dan Zakreski's 1999 piece,
Lies and Shattered Lives

Richard Quinney, as the director
of prosecutions, would seem also to be the director of this cover-up.
He had access to all the information. He knew the foster parents
were innocent. He knew that the deaf birth parents could be easily
tricked by unsympathetic sign-translators and over-worked legal
aid lawyers! He got his convictions in 1992. But those convictions
were overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1995!
Richard Quinney proceeded with
defamatory libel charges against John and Johanna Lucas even
though he knew that the statements they made against Sgt. Dueck
were true.
In a February, 1998 StarPhoenix
interview Quinney was asked about the various malicious prosecution
lawsuits against his office to which he replied with the words
quoted under his picture on the right:
Those who are suing might want
not only to get to the position they were in prior to the charges
being laid but to be at the place they would be if the charges
had never been laid!
Now Richard
Quinney has managed to carry his deceptions all the way to the
Supreme Court of Canada. In their effort to get the public's
attention, John and Johanna Lucas put their complaints about
Dueck in stark language which many people thought was offensive
and others thought were unwise. That is all they were ever guilty
of and that is not a crime. However, in Saskatchewan these two
people have done time for exercising their right to free speech.
Richard Quinney is responsible for this shameful blot on our
province.
In Saskatchewan, people have
gone to jail for saying true words!
Two of the original 12 plaintiffs
in the $10M lawsuit have died since
it was launched.
Full text of Supreme Court
Decision on R.
v Lucas
Star
Phoenix feature article by Dan Zakreski, June 19, 1999
Globe
and Mail feature (1995)
Scandal
of the Century
There is evidence that Matt
Miazga wanted to drop the charges against the foster parents
in this case right after the preliminary hearing. As reported
by the StarPhoenix, he met with Quinney and other top officials
in Regina and returned to Saskatoon to push for a conviction
on Peter Klassen, the most vulnerable of those charged who had
a prior conviction for child molestation. Under pressure from
other members of his family Peter agreed to plead guilty in exchange
for a two year sentence. His understanding was that the charges
against the rest of his family would be dropped. Instead, Peter
received a four year sentence which he fully served between 1993
and 1997. His family members' names were not cleared. Rather
they were smeared with Miazga's announcement that the trials
would stop because the children were too traumatized to continue
testifying. The clear implication was that the Crown was having
to release dangerous sex offenders into the community because
the Crown could not meet its burden of proof against them.
Code of Professional Conduct, Adopted by The Law Society of Saskatchewan
effective on October
1, 1991
Duties
of Defence Counsel
10. When defending an accused
person, the lawyer's duty is to protect the client as far as
possible from being convicted except by a court of competent
jurisdiction and upon legal evidence sufficient to support a
conviction for the offence charged. Accordingly, and notwithstanding
the lawyer's private opinion as to credibility or merits, the
lawyer may properly rely upon all available evidence or defences
including so-called technicalities not known to be false or fraudulent.
Quinney's
remarks are cynical when one looks closely at how he has violated
the code of his own profession.
CHAPTER IX, The Lawyer
as Advocate
Duties of Prosecutor
9. When engaged as a prosecutor,
the lawyer's prime duty is not to seek a conviction, but
to present before the trial court all available credible evidence
relevant to the alleged crime in order that justice may be
done through a fair trial upon the merits. The
prosecutor exercises a public function involving much discretion
and power and must act fairly and dispassionately. The prosecutor
should not do anything that might prevent the accused from being
represented by counsel or communicating with counsel and, to
the extent required by law and accepted practice, should make
timely disclosure to the accused or defence counsel (or to the
court if the accused is not represented) of all relevant facts
and known witnesses, whether tending to show guilt or innocence,
or that would affect the punishmentof the accused. Throughout
Martensville, the Foster Parent cases, and in many other instances,
the Crown, under Richard Quinney's direction has used bias and
trickery to gain convictions. In the Lucas matter, Quinney and
everyone working under him knew the Lucases' so called "defamatory"
remarks against Dueck were essentially true and were made in
an effort to bring to public account an errant police officer.
Quinney knew then and he must certainly know now (since the convictions
against the birth parents were overturned by the Supreme Court)
that the children's testimony was preposterous and that Julie
was being further victimized while Dueck and Bunko-Ruys were
conducting their interrogations in the "soft room."
Yet Quinney assigned his top prosecutors to use technical tricks
that are available to defense lawyers but not to prosecutors in order to bait, foil and ultimately convict
and jail the Lucases. At the end of the Lucases's trial, in 1995,
when Judge Hrabinsky sentenced John to two years and Johanna
to eighteen months, he dribbled on at great length about Sgt.
Brian Dueck's honour and how the besmirchment of such honour
was a terrible crime.The Supreme Court picked this up and went
even further in blurring the line between speech and action,
going so far as to protect Dueck's name, even though it had already
been published in the Globe and Mail and other respectable
media. This portrayal of Dueck as the suffering victim of unfair
words was Richard Quinney's dishonest artfulness, employed to
create a new lie in his cover-up.
See Sgt.
Dueck's record | Letter
to Roy Romanow, July 25, 1993, Actions
and exoneration, and Saskatchewan cover-up
in the foster parent scandal.
injusticebusters!say:
Shame on Saskatchewan
Justice! As long as it continues to cover-up the rape and torture
of Kathleen Ross by her brother, Michael Ross and fails to prosecute
those responsible, it has no moral right to prosecute anybody
for anything. In fact, many of them should be in jail themselves!
The minute social worker Carol Bunko Ruys informed Corporal Brian
Dueck this was happening, he had an obligation to protect Kathy.
Instead he brushed the concern
aside because he felt it was more important to keep the children
together so he could coerce them into naming more adults so he
could get in on the trend of prosecuting innocent people on the
uncorroborated testimony of children. Because the children were
kept together and Michael was encouraged to make up his stories,
his sisters, Michelle and Kathy were subjected to hundreds of
rapes which could have been prevented.
This case took
place during a time when Saskatchewan was actively prosecuting
citizens based on the uncorroborated testimony of children. Many
unjustly charged and prosecuted people have claims working their
way through the Courts to clear their names. There is no question
that Dueck aided and abetted. The Saskatoon Police Department
also aided and abetted. And it tried to cover its complicity
by promoting Dueck to Sergeant and moving him over to narcotics
where he jumped on the Ritalin bandwagon. Brian Dueck does not
give a damn about street kids buying and selling ritalin any
more than he gave a damn about Kathy.
Trying to get Dueck to account for himself
When the Klassens and Kvellos
got a good look at the Crown's disclosure against them after
the charges against them were stayed, they discovered the lengths
to which Dueck had gone in his relentless, ruthless and illegal
investigation.
Letters were written to every
possible official department asking for an official explanation.
None was forthcoming. More letters were written and the media
also became involved in calling for a public inquiry. Thousands
of faxes were sent. The evidence was hand-delivered to the police
department.
John and Johanna Lucas then
took to the streets. They were charged with defamation against
Dueck. Their signs said: "Did Dueck just allow or help with the rape/sodomy
of an 8 year old?"
,"If
you admit it Dueck, then you might get help with your touching
problem.," "Did Sgt. Dueck help/or
take part in the rape & sodomy of an 8 year old. The Thompson
papers prove Dueck allowed his witness to rape"; and "The Thompson papers prove Sgt. Dueck
allowed the false arrest & detention of Mrs. Lucas,
with a falsified information".
A year later, Richard Klassen,
Rob Klassen and Sheila Steele were arrested: Rick and Rob carried
signs saying"Carol
Bunko-Ruys helped/took part in the rape and sodomy of an eight
year old girl." and
"Sgt.
Brian Dueck helped/took part in the rape and sodomy of an eight
year old girl." Steele's sign said "Sgt. Dueck and Bunko-Ruys should be
arrested and tried for their crimes." and "Arrest and charge those
responsible for the rape of an eight year old"
Although the message is stated
different ways, all the signs were created to pressure the government
and police to address Dueck's manufactured case. The signs were all
carried in a spirit of free speech. See Defamation | John Lucas'
lawsuit
|
More about
prosecutors: The
Seven Deadly Sins of prosecutors | Lessons
from the Proulx case | Courageous prosecutor Terry
Hinz | Miazga | Hansen | Quinney | Defence lawyers who perhaps
love the Crown too much : Holgate |
Dufour | Axworthy
| the lawyers in the following waltzes of their clients to guilty
verdicts: Gerald Morris
| Howard Gowan | Leon
Walchuk | Don Smith |
Jay Watson |
|
Truth can never be
told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd. William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell
Truth suppress'd, whether
by courts or crooks, will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com
If you hold the mouth
of Truth, It will burst out its rib-cage. Somali proverb
Publisher : Sheila
Steele
Got something
to say about this or any other stories on this site? Go to injusticebustersblog Participate!
- injusticebusters
court advice :
- How
to walk yourself through the justice system
-
- Why
you should dump your preliminary hearing (written July 1998 and still valid)
-
- Sermonette: Sucked
in, Diegested and spit out by Saskatoon police (You will find links
to many more sermonettes in the sidebar on this page
Another target of Dueck's
malice:
Wilf
Hathway
Our activism
contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the
civil trial.
Please participate
by posting your own photos and links of activism in your community.
Index
to the stories on this website
This is not
regularly updated so if you are looking for a particular story
and you have a name or keyword, please use the site search engine(at
the bottom of the page) which IS regularly updated
Index to Saskatoon Police stories
This is a pretty good scrapbook
for the 1998-2002 period.
Hatchen and Munson: These two drove
Darrell Night to the edge of Saskatoon
on a freezing January night in 2000. They were found guilty of
unlawful confinement, did some time and are acknowledged by the
Saskatoon Police Service for each having served for 17 years.
The Police Association stood by them and paid for their defence
until they were convicted. Only then were they fired.
-
- Edmonton
police
- Halifax
- Toronto
police
- Vancouver police
- Winnipeg
police
-
- 2005: In
the United States the proven wrongful convictions just keep coming
at us!
Canadians who have
been wrongfully convicted because of improper investigations
combined with zealous Crown
Supreme
Court orders new trial and quashes conviction in two more cases
with improper disclosure issues
A round-up of wrongful convictions in Canada
- Robert
Baltovich
- Michael
Burns
- Sebastian Burns
- Rodney
Cain
- Wilbert
Coffin
(hanged, 1953)
- Jason Dix
- Jim
Driskell
- Jody
Druken
- Randy
Druken
- Hugues
Duguay
- Michel
Dumont
- Peter
Frumusa
- Walter
Gillespie and Robert Mailman
- Clayton
Johnson
- Yvonne
Johnson
- Herman
Kaglik
- Darren
Koehn
- Kulaveeringsam
"Kulam" Karthiresu
- Stephen
Leadbeater
- Donald
Marshall
- Chris
McCullough
- Michael
McTaggart
- Felix
Michaud
- David
Milgaard
- Guy Paul
Morin
- Shannon
Murrin
- Jamie
Nelson
- Greg
Parsons
- Benoit
Proulx
- Atif Rafay
- Louise
Reynolds
- Thomas
Sophonow
- Gary
Staples
- Billy
Taillefer
- Steven
Truscott
- Joe
Warren
- Leon
Walchuk
-
- AIDWYC
- Innocence Project (Canada)
- Innocence Project (U.S.)
- Northwest Law Center on Wrongful Convictions
-
- Kirstin
Lobato
- Jeffrey
Scott Hornoff
- Willie
Upshaw
- Hurricane
Carter
- Guildford
4
- Birmingham
6
- Amirault
- Houston
- U.S. wrongful convictions:
Exonerateed
- Laurence
Adams
- Ludrate
Burton
- Stephen
Cowans
- Wilton
Dedge
- Albert
Johnson
- Kenneth
Marsh
- Dwayne
McKinney
- James Bernard Parker
- Peter
Reilly
- Peter
Rose
- Sylvester
Smith
- Clifford
St. Joseph
- John
Stoll
- Marty
Tankleff
- Wilton
Dedge
- Ray
Krone
-
- Still working on it:
- Dennis Deschaine
- Dennis
Perry
- Tim
Sandfort
|