|
The
Zarzaczny fiat: How a Queen's Bench judge was deceived
A Fiat from
Czarist Russia? No, just another piece of Saskatchewan cover-up
SASKATOON, January 30, 2001:
Judge J. Zarzeczny's fiat came down today. This is the decision
he reserved January 16 after hearing Superintendent Dueck's application
to gag Richard Klassen and injusticebusters. In court, he said
that "if the defendants (Dueck and the government) wanted
a ruling against the website, they would have to go somewhere
else."
This judgment tells them exactly
where to go. To criminal court. The fiat says that injusticebusters have violated the non-publication
order by publishing material obtained through discovery process
in Q.B. claim 271, 1994. This is a lie. But it goes on to say
that all the material on a discovery list filed by the defendents
in 1994 now becomes discovery material. The truth is that all
this material was in our hands before the lawsuit was ever laid
and was the very basis for the laying of the lawsuit.
Through smoke and mirrors Zarzeczny
has provided Dueck & co. with the basis for the laying of
criminal contempt charges against Richard Klassen and Sheila
Steele for continuing to make public information they first posted
on the internet in June, 1998. It also provides the basis for
criminal charges to be laid against the Fifth Estate.
The judgment is now posted.
Read it and judge for yourselves. The Correspondence 2000 page
can be found here. Our report
on the exams for discovery, which Zarzeczny reads as evidence
that Richard Klassen has broken the Rules of Court by making
public discovery material is simply not true. injusticebusters reported on the general progress of
a lawsuit which is of interest to the public.
Richard Klassen was not allowed
to speak because he was still represented by Ed holgate. Holgate
did not believe that injusticebusters was not publishing discovery
material and yet he spokee to the matter. Holgate was, at that
time, withholding important material from Richard Klassen and
refusing to accept any e-mail from injusticebusters. After Richard
Klassen finally fired Holgate and took carriage of his own case
inn November, 2001, Holgate called us both liars.
The fiat is also interesting
in that it orders the lawsuit plaintiffs to pay costs (which
would amount to two or three thousand dollars) and gags the plaintiffs
or any third parties from talking about the case. No such restriction
has been placed on Dueck and the other defendants. Dueck, in
1998, before this website even went up, told the StarPhoenix,
after losing his libel case against Klassen that if he "couldn't
get [Klassen] in a criminal action, he would go after him civilly."
Quinney, two months earlier
had told the StarPhoenix that the accused should go on with their
lives and gloated that a case of malicious
prosecution had never been won and that the Klassens, Kvellos
and Sterlings would not win, either.
January, 2002: Along with more
humane interpretations of the law regarding persons' rights to
successfully bring forth clear cases of malice, the Supreme Court
has also let it be known it will not tolerate criminal police
actions which are covered by publication
bans.
Zarzaczny's fiat pages. 1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 | 8
| 9 | 10
| 11 | Rick
Klassen responds
| Carol
Bunko-Ruys Reports | The Thompson
papers | Dueck's torture of Anita
|