A living scrapbook of injustices in progress and the tools to set them right
Restoring reputations to the defamed -- Telling the truth about the undefamable
Year of the David Milgaard Inquiry: 35 years in the making!

 

 "Tell a big enough lie often enough and people will believe it's true." -- Joseph Goebbels, Third Reich Minister of Enlightenment and Propaganda

The defendant Prosecutors' Statement as to Documents which theoretically describes this mess.

Miazga's request for approval for cult experts | Dueck's credentials | In the news: Lawyerless litigants frustrating the system | Jan. 2004: Sermonette on McKillop and Quennell, the non-dynamic duo | More on McKillop: January 2004 update

What happened when Richard Klassen drove to Regina to get the box of documents McKillop had phoned that he'd just found . . .

January 28, 2002, 10 a.m.

Present: Don McKillop, solicitor for prosecutors in QB 271, Richard Klassen, plaintiff acting for himself, Angela Geworsky (who Richard had previously obtained agreement from McKillop to accompany him to help sort through the documents.)

Don McKillop: I think that we need to sit down and discuss a few things before I show you any more documents. I have a bit of a problem showing you documents if you are going to be giving them to other people. I would like you to take a look at a fax that I received just this morning. Can you read that and tell me if you are aware of that, or if you have seen that before? (letter dated January 27/02)

Richard Klassen: Yes I am, I received a copy of that last night.

Don McKillop: You are aware that you have an order stating that you cannot do this Richard, why would you be doing this?

Richard Klassen: Well, if I see that there were crimes committed, I will reveal them to anyone who will look at them.

Don McKillop: I can't show you any more if this is what you are going to do. Then I am being a part of this. You should take this matter to court and it could be decided there. You can't be distributing documents from this civil suit.

Richard Klassen: I am not simply distributing documents Don. A civil suit does not restrict someone from revealing crimes. Everyone can see the crimes that have been committed here, the public, media, prosecutors, lawyers. They had no reasonable and probable grounds to charge us in the first place, but this isn't about what they have done to us, or the money, this is about what happened to those two little girls. I don't know if you have children Don, but I do, and what happened to those kids is a crime. Someone is going to pay for what happened.

Don McKillop: I thought this wasn't about the money?

Richard Klassen: ACCOUNTABILITY for crimes Don. They committed crimes.

Don McKillop: Oh Yeah, I guess that would count. Well Richard, let me tell you something. You will never win in court, you just won't.

Richard Klassen: Well Don, you know that the Fifth Estate just aired another show, and the e-mails that we are getting with public support are overwhelming, and I know that the politicians are getting e-mail about this, and Chris Axworthy, the police, because we are getting copies of those.

Don McKillop: You know where I stand with this, and let me tell you that you stand a better chance bothering the politicians till they pay you to go away, than you would taking this to court?

Richard Klassen: Everyone that was involved knew what was happening to them (the Ross twins) and did nothing to stop it. It's sick Don, those people are sick, they make me sick. How can you defend sick people that would allow little girls to be raped? Maybe you don't care about kids!

Don McKillop: Don't you put words into my mouth Mr. Klassen. Don't tell me what I care about.

Richard Klassen: (stands up) Don't you yell at me Mr. McKillop, you are defending the very people that allowed this to happen to those girls. Don't you get it? These are CRIMES.

Don McKillop: Sit down Mr. Klassen, sit down. I am not here to debate this with you Richard. Tell me then, if this is what you have found then why have you not taken this to the police, why haven't you had charges laid?

Richard Klassen: (Laughs) do you actually think that anyone will be charged for this in Saskatchewan. I have taken it to the police before. Now I am taking it to the public. I am meeting with the Star Phoenix today.

Don McKillop: (snickers) what are you going to do, get the Star Phoenix to charge?

Richard Klassen: People are listening, and I will tell whoever will listen. Dueck is sick, it's just plain sick how can you defend these people. Are they your buddies?

Don McKillop: Why would you call him my buddy? I am not defending Dueck.

Richard Klassen: Yeah, well you are defending Miazga, he put in his own handwriting about those girls being raped, "continue to screw each other" Carol Bunko-Ruys knew, Kathy even told her that she had lied about everyone else back in 1993. She covered it up, you're defending Carol aren't you?

Don McKillop: You don't have a case Richard. This all has nothing to do with your lawsuit.

Richard Klassen: It has everything to do with malicious prosecution. Judges are recognizing malicious prosecution. But you probably think that we did it, you probably think that we are guilty.

Don McKillop: Well Richard, you were never convicted in court so by those means you would not be guilty. But I don't know if you did it or not, I would suppose you didn't, but I don't know.

Richard Klassen: (laughs) that's all right Don, we have all the evidence we need, we have DNA evidence, the kids are our DNA evidence, and it can't get any better than that. Have you ever read any of this stuff? I suggest you look at the evidence against us: there was none. Read what you have Don. Read what is, your case! I am not discouraged about going to court; we are going to have to face off with a judge sooner or later, may as well be sooner.

Don McKillop: You broke the judge's order Richard, why didn't you deal with this when you were in court last time?

Richard Klassen: You say that there are no crimes here. We never had this material last time I was in court. And what about disclosure? We have NEVER had these documents, we had never seen them. I take it that you don't believe in Stinchcombe, never mind that we didn't go to trial, we were five days away and all we had amounted to about a two-inch thick stack as compared to six boxes that there are now. You tell me Don.

Don McKillop: You could have dealt with this issue last time Richard.

Richard Klassen: We didn't KNOW this material even existed Don, that's the whole point! ACCOUNTABILITY, I want accountability, and I deserve compensation. This isn't just about the money this is about those girls, but I do deserve compensation. I have put everything that I have into this case.

Don McKillop: Well, I know that you want your day in court, and you will get it. If you win Richard, you would get punitive damages of course. So that is where we will have to go from here.

Richard Klassen: I will continue to reveal these crimes as I find them Don.

Don McKillop: Well you are breaking the order, that is contempt of court!

Richard Klassen; Well then, throw me in jail, make a martyr out of me. I am not going to stand by and allow this crime to go uncovered. I take it then that you are denying me the right to view the documents.

Don McKillop: That's right Richard; unless you can assure me that you will not be giving them out.

Richard Klassen: I could assure you that I would not show anyone anything, if I don't find any crimes to show.

Don McKillop: Well then we will have to deal with this in court.

Rick: All right then Don, Thank you.


Dueck docs | Bunko-Ruys reports | Thompson papers | Court fiat Jan. 2001 | Rick's page | Beryl Stonechild | Saskatchewan Court of Appeal | Lawsuit (lack of) progress | Lawsuit filed by Peter Klassen and Michael Ross | Steele letter to City Hall | Richard Klassen's letter to police, 1994 | Kathy's letter to Chris Axworthy | Miazga congratulates his cohorts |

index to individual injustice stories | Index to Saskatoon Police stories

Truth can never be told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd.
William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell

Truth suppress'd, whether by courts or crooks, will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com


Publisher Sheila Steele

Got something to say about this or any other stories on this site? Go to injusticebustersblog Participate!

 

Another target of Dueck's malice:

Wilf Hathway

Our activism contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the civil trial.

Please participate by posting your own photos and links of activism in your community.


Index to the stories on this website

This is not regularly updated so if you are looking for a particular story and you have a name or keyword, please use the site search engine(at the bottom of the page) which IS regularly updated

Index to Saskatoon Police stories

This is a pretty good scrapbook for the 1998-2002 period.


September 8, 2003: Trial Begins
September 09, 2003: Pamela Klassen Shetterly's Testimony
September 10, 2003: Anita Klassen
September 11, 2003: Michelle Ross
September 12, 2003: Sheila Verway
September 16, 2003: Michael Ross
September 18, 2003: Ellen Gunn
September 19, 2003: Terry Hinz
September 19, 2003:StarPhoenix editorial, Terry Hinz
September 20, 2003: Louis Dupuis
September 27, 2003: Ron Schindell, Jay Watson
October 01, 2003: Case
against the Klassens weak: documents
October 02, 2003: Judge asked to dismiss suit: No evidence of malicious intent: lawyers
October 2, 2003: Letter to the editor from former "Believe the children" advocate
October 03, 2003: Lawyer details evidence of malice
October 04, 2003: Judge ponders request to drop Klassen lawsuit
October 27, 2003: Judge Baynton's interim decision: Quinney dropped, the rest proceed
October 27, 2003: Claim goes forward
October 29, 2003: Brian Dueck
October 30, 2003: Dueck
October 31, 2003: Brian Dueck
November 01, 2003: Matthew Miazga
November 04, 2003: Matthew Miazga
November 05, 2003: Matthew Miazga
November 06, 2003: Sonja Hansen

 

injusticebusters' daily reports 1 | 2

Final judgment: Dec. 30, 2003 |

articles and editorials from Jan 6-9 | Sabo's apology | Editorials: StarPhoenix, Leader Post and National Post > > > | National Post front page story, Jan. 10 > > > | Sarah Gibb's profile of Richard and Kari Klassen | Lives ruined by Jason Warick, Feb. 19 | | April 15/04: Judge Baynton warns defendants' lawyers not to delay damages trial | Dueck drops his appeal | Full transcript of Dueck's examinations for discovery which were part of the read-ins at the civil trial

Federal Prosecutors Report
Bad forensics
The CSI effect
"Expert" testimony
Reid Technique
Monique Turenne
James Driskell
 
Edmonton police
Halifax
Toronto police
Vancouver police
Winnipeg police
 
2005: In the United States the proven wrongful convictions just keep coming at us!

Canadians who have been wrongfully convicted because of improper investigations combined with zealous Crown

Robert Baltovich
Michael Burns
Sebastian Burns
Wilbert Coffin (hanged, 1953)
Jason Dix
Jim Driskell
Jody Druken
Randy Druken
Michel Dumont
Peter Frumusa
Walter Gillespie and Robert Mailman
Clayton Johnson
Yvonne Johnson
Herman Kaglik
Darren Koehn
Kulaveeringsam "Kulam" Karthiresu
Stephen Leadbeater
Donald Marshall
Chris McCullough
Michael McTaggart
Felix Michaud
David Milgaard
Guy Paul Morin
Shannon Murrin
Jamie Nelson
Greg Parsons
Benoit Proulx
Atif Rafay
Louise Reynolds
Thomas Sophonow
Gary Staples
Steven Truscott
Joe Warren
Leon Walchuk

 

Home

Search for
© 2001 www.injusticebusters.com
E-mail injusticebusters

May 10, 2005

This page was created winter, 2002