|
Charlie
Smoke | Tony Merchant
| index to drunk-dumping
stories on Saskatoon Police | Darrell
Night | Frozen Ghosts
| Saskatoon
cops, general | The
record of Saskatoon west side Superintendent Brian Dueck
| Stinchcombe |
See also: Residential
School Survivors
Court paves way for native
schools lawsuit
By KIRK MAKIN, Globe
and Mail, Mar. 28, 2003
Ontario's highest court has
cleared the way for tens of thousands of descendants of aboriginals
who attended residential schools to sue the federal government
for intentionally eradicating their culture.
The Ontario Court of Appeal
ruling allows the children of residential school students to
sue over a policy they believe systematically destroyed their
rights, language, culture and way of life.
"This sets an important
precedent," said Joseph Griffiths, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.
"This is largely uncharted territory. I think our clients
will be very pleased to hear that the law extends to them."
The 3-0 ruling was a blow to
government lawyers who argued that the law does not recognize
a right to sue for individuals who were not born at the time
alleged wrongdoing occurred.
The ruling also flew in the
face of government warnings that the court could open floodgates
to innumerable claims from children - and possibly grandchildren
- of the approximately 17,000 people who attended the residential
schools.
Mr. Griffiths said in an interview
that the ruling also "throws a huge wrench" into a
massive federal program to settle residential school claims in
return for claimants waiving any right to sue.
"The government will look
at this decision as a bad one, and will almost undoubtedly seek
to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada," he predicted.
Mr. Griffiths and Russell Kronick,
Q.C. - the senior lawyer for the plaintiffs - represent 56 plaintiffs
who attended two Roman Catholic residential schools in Spanish,
Ont., between 1934 and 1960. They are suing the church and the
government for assault, sexual abuse, wrongful confinement, forced
labour and negligence.
The lawyers also represent
189 children of the primary plaintiffs.
"We are saying that the
children of the residential school students suffered their own
type of harm - especially to the transmission of their culture
and heritage," Mr. Griffiths said.
"In order to have a cause
of action, you normally have to suffer harm firsthand,"
he said. "The Court of Appeal has recognized that the injuries
suffered here are historical. I think this is novel in its entirety.
We were unable to find any cited cases in which a policy has
this sort of effect on future generations."
The government had initially
succeeded in having the claims thrown out by a lower-court judge.
The judge agreed that it was "plain and obvious" that
the government owed no fiduciary duty to an individual who didn't
exist at the time of the alleged injurious act.
"The Crown submits that
the law has always distinguished between an unborn child and
a child after birth," Mr. Justice Jean-Marc Labrosse wrote
yesterday. "It is the Crown's position that the secondary
plaintiffs are asking the court to ignore this distinction and
to take a futher step in recognizing a duty of care owed to future
generations of children not yet conceived."
He noted that the Crown warned
that ruling for the plaintiffs would create "the spectre
of indeterminate liability," and radically extend the law
into an area that belongs to elected legislatures - not the courts.
However, Judge Labrosse, Madam
Justice Louise Charron and Madam Justice Eileen Gillese were
not deterred. Without considering the merits of the case itself
- issues that can only be dealt with at trial - they said a trial
can proceed.
On a separate issue, the court
ruled against the descendants being able to pursue claims under
the Family Law Act for damages suffered by their relatives.
Lawyers for the federal government
could not be reached for comment last night.
|
Truth can never be
told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd. William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell
Truth suppress'd, whether
by courts or crooks, will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com
If you hold the mouth
of Truth, It will burst out its rib-cage. Somali proverb
Publisher : Sheila
Steele
Got something
to say about this or any other stories on this site? Go to injusticebustersblog Participate!
- injusticebusters
court advice :
- How to walk yourself through the justice system
-
- Why you should dump your preliminary hearing (written July 1998 and still valid)
-
- Sermonette:
The
Naked Truth -- (You
will find links to many more sermonettes in the sidebar on this
page
Another target
of Dueck's malice: : Wilf Hathway
Our activism
contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the civil
trial.
Index
to the stories on this website
This is not
regularly updated so if you are looking for a particular story
and you have a name or keyword, please use the site search engine(at
the bottom of the page) which IS regularly updated
Index to Saskatoon Police stories
This is a pretty good scrapbook
for the 1998-2002 period.

Inquiry into the malicious prosecution of David
Milgaard untanling 36 years of Saskatchewan police and Crown
misconduct: : Opening day 1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 |
|