|
Hathway letter from remand | injusticebusters
original coverage of Hathway | |
Robert Stewart: has a publication
ban helped keep this man in Collins Bay, Kingston for 9 years
after an unfair trial? | Original
coverage of Crawford murder |
Wilf Hathway
Most
recent reports
Attention all
media: This Crown attempt to keep from the public the true nature of RCMP activities
in securing false testimony against innocent people should cause
alarm.
I have voluntarily
removed the name of the operative from this website until the
issue can be addressed in court, Tuesday morning. I arrived at
this agreement during a telephone conversation with undercover
RCMP legal counsel Jeffrey Hayes who will serve me with the appropriate
documents to appear in provincial court Tuesday morning at the
beginning of the evidence hearing for Wilf Hathway.
I have changed
the operative's name to Martin until this matter is resolved.
Evidence error
surprises defence at preliminary hearing
Darren Bernhardt, The
StarPhoenix, September 2, 2005
Wilfred Gordon Hathway's preliminary
hearing on a charge of second-degree murder hit a snag Thursday
when it was discovered the Crown prosecutor had documents the
defence did not, including an alleged confession.
The realization on the part
of defence lawyer Robert Borden comes just as the hearing to
determine whether there is enough evidence for the case to go
to trial enters its final few days. A Hathway supporter says
a new hearing may have to be held.
"It's a whole new case.
It wouldn't be serving justice properly if Robert wasn't given
the chance to read through all the new documentation before continuing
(with the hearing) and making sure nothing else was changed,"
said Richard Klassen, who has been helping Borden research the
case against Hathway.
The preliminary hearing has
been happening, with a few breaks, since late July. Getting that
information this late in the game "is like reading War and
Peace several times and becoming familiar with it -- then someone
adds a new section and it changes the story," Borden said
outside of the provincial courthouse during a morning adjournment.
Hathway, 46, insists he is
innocent in the 1998 stabbing death of his former landlord, Denver
Bruce Crawford, 84. Crawford operated a rooming house at 323
Ninth Street East at the time and lived on the main level. His
body was found by Hathway, who called the police.
He was arrested in British
Columbia last year and has been in prison for 16 months awaiting
trial for a crime he insists he did not commit.
Evidence in the preliminary
hearing has been banned from publication, although Hathway wanted
it all open to being reported. He claims the public should understand
the sloppy manner in which the police investigation against him
was performed.
On Thursday, Borden learned
the pages of his documents did not match those of the Crown.
He also wondered about some of the testimony put forth by the
lead investigator, when the statements referred to reports Borden
had not seen.
When confronted about the missing
documents, Crown prosecutor Brent Klause suggested the information
would have been provided to Hathway's two previous lawyers (both
of whom were fired by Hathway) and may have been misplaced.
It may also have been a printing
error, Klause said. Copies of the police files in the case are
printed off differently for the Crown and defence because the
Crown's copy contains notes for the prosecution that are not
meant for disclosure.
"For 16 months he's been
in jail without this (information)," Klassen said from the
gallery seats, referring to Hathway's right to see the disclosure.
"I'm not talking to you,
Mr. Klassen," said Klause.
"I'm not talking to you
either. I'm speaking to the court," said Klassen, who was
once subject of a high-profile police investigation but was vindicated
in 2003 after a social worker, police officer and Crown prosecutor
were all found liable for malicious prosecution.
Hathway, who has been vocal
throughout the preliminary hearing, did not utter a word on Thursday.
Klause promised Borden a new
copy of the materials -- to "hit the print button"
designated for the Crown and provide Borden an exact copy of
his own documents.
Outside court, Klassen suggested
Borden should bypass the preliminary hearing, which could get
dragged out even longer, and go straight for indictment, so Hathway
wouldn't have to wait any longer for a trial. Klassen is certain
Hathway would be found innocent. A trial will also mean all the
information the police want banned will be available to be reported.
Borden said he is keeping his
options open. Meanwhile, the preliminary hearing is set to continue
today and will resume on Wednesday.
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2005
Publication ban extended
in murder case
Lawyers debate risk to undercover officers
Darren Bernhardt, The
StarPhoenix, August 24, 2005
A temporary publication ban
against identifying officers involved in an undercover operation
against accused murderer Wilfred Gordon Hathway was extended
Tuesday, despite protests from lawyers representing the media
and the accused.
No time limit was set on the
ban, which was initially put in place July 26, with Tuesday's
hearing set aside for arguments.
Under the section of the Criminal
Code cited for the ban, publication of anything related to the
police is also prohibited. That includes their method of operation,
which Hathway and his lawyer, Robert Borden, maintain is flawed.
Reynold Robertson, who represented
The StarPhoenix and the CBC, also argued that the public should
know how the police go about establishing their evidence.
"The RCMP do screw up
and that is why there should be public accountability,"
he said. "I accept that courts have said there are limits
to what the press can say in certain situations but I don't see
that here."
Being a police officer is inherently
dangerous, but an undercover officer's risks are no different
than those of a daily patrol officer, whose identities are readily
known and who often testify in court, Robertson told Judge Sheila
Whelan.
But Jeffrey Hayes, a lawyer
with the federal Attorney General who is representing the RCMP,
said publicity "creates risk" for officers.
He cited several cases in British
Columbia, where bans are routinely placed on identities and everything
remotely associated with possible identification. Hathway was
living in B.C. when he was arrested in May 2004.
"I want to make it clear
that my client wants publication of anything and everything except
for the names of officers," Borden told Whelan. "He
doesn't want anyone to be in imminent harm."
Hathway, 46, has been charged
with first-degree murder in the 1998 stabbing death of his then-Saskatoon
landlord, Denver Bruce Crawford, 84. A preliminary hearing, which
is held to determine if the case should be committed to trial,
is underway.
Evidence presented in a preliminary
hearing is customarily banned, regardless of the RCMP application.
But Hayes wants the ban to also be in place if the matter proceeds
to trial in open court.
Borden told Whelan he intends
to apply to have the preliminary evidence publishable, as his
client wishes.
Hathway, who has been outspoken
from the prisoner's box through much of his preliminary hearing,
sat quiet Tuesday. His legs were secured with leg irons for the
first time.
Instead, the lawyers argued
with one another, particularly Robertson and Hayes. Hayes suggested
officers' lives are at risk and they could be killed, if identified.
That prompted Robertson to jump to his feet.
"You're making that up,
for God's sake," he said loudly, then apologized to Whelan.
"There's no evidence at
all that anyone has been harmed as a result of their identity
being made known," Robertson said a little later, as he
wrapped up his arguments.
Hayes stood to object, suggesting
Robertson cross-examine an officer about it. As Robertson began
to respond, Hayes ordered him to back off.
"Excuse me. When one counsel
speaks, one counsel sits."
Borden pointed out his client's
commendable behaviour and asked that it be noted on the record,
since there has been much said about his outbursts. As Whelan
agreed, Hathway broke his silence.
"It's not my intention
to be good," he said. "My quest is for the truth."
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2005
Judge warns accused over
outbursts
Darren Bernhardt, The
StarPhoenix, August 23, 2005
Except for repeatedly called
the Crown prosecutor a liar at one point, accused murderer Wilfred
Gordon Hathway sat composed and cross-legged as his preliminary
hearing resumed Monday following a four-week break.
The 46-year-old is accused
of first-degree murder in the 1998 stabbing death of his former
landlord, Denver Bruce Crawford, 84. Hathway has had difficulty
keeping his emotions in check during the hearing, shouting objections
and getting into heated arguments with prosecutor Brent Klause.
Evidence in the preliminary
hearing, held to determine if the case should go to trial, is
banned from publication. The atmosphere inside the courtroom
is not, however.
Hathway restrained himself
for the morning and nearly all of the afternoon as his lawyer,
Robert Borden, cross-examined the Saskatoon police force's lead
investigator in the case.
"It's because he's a liar.
He's a liar," Hathway said at one point during the cross-examination,
directing the comments to Klause.
Judge Sheila Whelan called
for an adjournment and when court resumed, took a few minutes
to discuss her expectation of "decorum."
"Mr. Hathway, things have
gone smoothly today, for the most part," she said.
"Yeah, I'm pretty proud
of myself," Hathway responded.
"Well, I'm not,"
Whelan said, prompting Hathway to say, "I can see that."
"For every outburst from
now on, I will take an adjournment -- first it will be 15 minutes,
then 30 -- and I will delay this process as much as I need to,"
Whelan explained.
"I'm doing my best,"
Hathway said.
During the four days of hearing
in July, Hathway had to be physically restrained at one point
by a guard after Klause threatened to slap a contempt of court
order on him.
The hearing will take a break
today to allow Whelan to hear arguments from lawyers for the
federal Justice Department and some Saskatoon media outlets.
The federal government, on behalf of the RCMP, is seeking a publication
ban on the identities of undercover officers involved in Hathway's
investigation.
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2005
CREDIT:
Greg Pender, The StarPhoenix
Wilfred Gordon Hathway arrives back at the provincial correctional
centre Wednesday after his preliminary hearing
Judge intercepts notes to
gallery
Hathway's correspondence forbidden at hearing
Darren Bernhardt of
The StarPhoenix, Friday, July 29, 2005
Wilfred Gordon Hathway's preliminary
hearing, which was fraught with harsh words Wednesday, continued
its pugnacious ways on Thursday with bickering between lawyers
and a stormy exchange between the judge and a sheriff's deputy
who threatened to shut down the proceedings.
"You don't shut the trial
down, do you understand me?" Sheila Whelan said. "Security
doesn't give the court direction. The court gives security direction."
Whelan called a 15-minute break
just as the deputy began to explain his position.
"I'm not happy putting
security on the spot," she said, ordering counsel and security
to sort the matter out.
The confrontation resulted
from a request by defence lawyer Robert Borden that Hathway be
given a pencil and notepad.
But the guard beside Hathway
refused to allow "any kind of stylus."
"If he was to be given
any instrument, I would have to shut the trial down," the
deputy said.
"I'm not allowed to have
a pen in case I decide to do grievous harm to myself or others.
After all, I am a murderer, you know," Hathway said sarcastically,
raising his eyebrows and smiling.
Hathway, 46, is accused of
the 1998 stabbing death of his former landlord, Denver Bruce
Crawford, 84. Evidence in the preliminary hearing -- held to
determine if the case should go to trial -- is banned from publication.
But for the past two days, it was the peripheral matters that
made the news.
The pen episode was preceded
by an objection from Crown prosecutor Brent Klause, who was upset
by "encoded" notes being passed from Hathway to supporters
in the gallery. The notes were made by Hathway while he was in
jail Wednesday night.
"It's in some kind of
code, I don't know what it means," Klause said.
"It's none of your business,"
Hathway hollered.
Klause told Whelan the deputy
raised concern about the notes after being asked to pass one
to the gallery.
"I don't know what it
means, if they're planning a prison break at 10 o'clock or need
a bathroom break," said Klause.
Whelan agreed notes cannot
go the public gallery, but Borden and Hathway are free to pass
as many as they like, "and it doesn't matter if they are
in any language of the Earth or some code. It's a private matter."
The Crown does not need to
see the correspondence at all, she added, then admonished Klause
for referring to a prison break.
Court was in session at 9:30
a.m. Thursday, but evidence didn't start to be given until 11
a.m. after several issues were debated. Klause wanted a supporter
of Hathway's, Richard Klassen, to be banned from the proceedings.
Klause also objected to Borden's request to hire Angie Geworsky,
who normally works with Klassen, as an assistant. The pair research
claims of miscarriages of justice.
Klassen has been helping to
gather evidence in support of the defence. He has information
important to the case and may be called at some point as a witness,
said Klause. Whelan had made an order prohibiting any witnesses
from being in the courtroom unless they are on the stand testifying.
As for Geworsky, Klause accused
her of having "an axe to grind -- the same axe as Mr. Klassen."
"How is it that someone
who wants to assist an accused and get the truth has an axe to
grind?" Borden asked.
Whelan ruled against Klause
on both matters. But the verbal jousting didn't end there.
Borden expressed "serious
disclosure issues" with the Crown after learning a witness
statement wasn't included in the materials entered for evidence
by the prosecution.
Also, the defence has repeatedly
said Hathway has languished in prison since his arrest in May
2004. A preliminary hearing was first set for Oct. 12, 2004,
but Hathway fired his lawyer on the eve of it. He fired his second
lawyer in March 2004.
Had the proceedings started
when first planned, "they could have been over and done
with by June," Klause said.
Due to a lack of available
courtrooms, the preliminary hearing was adjourned to Aug. 22.
Before court let out, Whelan asked the lawyers to "resolve
as much as possible and make this somewhat more low key when
we resume. We've had a lot of issues you wouldn't normally anticipate."
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2005
Accused spars with prosecutor
Preliminary hearing filled with emotional outbursts
Darren Bernhardt, The
StarPhoenix, Thursday, July 28, 2005
Emotional outbursts and threats
of contempt set the tone as a tension-filled preliminary hearing
began Wednesday for a Saskatoon man facing a first-degree murder
charge.
Wilfred Gordon Hathway, 46,
is accused of the 1998 stabbing death of his former landlord,
Denver Bruce Crawford, 84. Evidence in the preliminary hearing
-- held to determine if the Crown has a strong enough case to
go to trial -- is banned from publication.
But it was the atmosphere inside
the provincial courtroom that took centre stage.
Hathway and Crown prosecutor
Brent Klause got into a heated argument at one point, which forced
Judge Sheila Whelan to call a temporary adjournment for everyone
to cool down. It happened as Klause set out his case with the
help of an investigating officer. Hathway took exception to something
the officer said and consulted with his lawyer, Robert Borden.
As they spoke, Klause snapped
at Hathway, "Did you just call me a f-- prick?"
"I was speaking to my
lawyer, sir," Hathway said, rising.
"You just called me a
f-- prick. I could read your lips," Klause said.
"What is this, Sue Thomas?"
Hathway fired back, referring to the TV series about a deaf,
lip-reading federal agent, Sue Thomas F.B. Eye. "I was talking
to my lawyer."
"So you called your lawyer
a f-- prick?" Klause said. "Do you want to be charged
with contempt of court?"
"By you?" Hathway
said, gesturing at Klause and being restrained by a sheriff's
deputy.
As Klause walked past Hathway's
chuckling supporters in the front row of the gallery, he told
them, "This is not a game." Hathway had been warned
about his outbursts by Whelan several times.
"Everyone's here because
of me and I can't say a damn thing. Nothing," Hathway grumbled
to sheriff's deputies during the break.
When she returned, Whelan scolded
Klause for his language. Hathway and Borden have a right to speak
confidentially "and we have to respect that," she said,
noting she didn't hear the alleged insult.
"I just want it on the
record, your honour, that he looked directly at me and mouthed
those words. That was my impression; I didn't make it up,"
Klause said.
"I'm not trying to reprimand
anyone. I just want decorum," Whelan said.
As the hearing continued, Hathway
took exception once again, challenging the witness.
"Is that what it says
(in the transcripts) or is that your opinion, sir?"
Borden told his client the
matter would be raised in time but Hathway wanted it clarified
immediately. Whelan explained how the judicial process works
but Hathway interrupted.
"If the process worked,
I wouldn't be sitting here for 15 months, ma'am," he said.
He was arrested in May 2004.
There was not enough evidence to hold him after the initial investigation
into the death. Borden has demanded to know what suddenly led
to the current charge.
Borden was also outraged to
learn the Crown had materials it hadn't provided him. He had
copies but wanted the original items.
"That's not full disclosure,"
he said.
"Cough 'em up Klause.
Cough 'em up," Hathway shouted in support.
"Talk to your counsel,
Mr. Hathway. Spare me the effort," Klause retorted.
The preliminary hearing is
set for three days. Borden plans to cross-examine the officer
today and Friday. If necessary, the hearing will continue in
late August, said Borden.
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2005
Man accused of murder
fights publication ban
CBC News, July 27, 2005
It's a legal rarity a
Saskatoon man accused of murdering his landlord wants the evidence
against him made public before his case goes to trial.
The preliminary hearing for
Wilfred Gordon Hathway, accused of killing Denver Bruce Crawford
in 1998, is being held in Saskatoon provincial court Wednesday.
Normally, there's a ban on
publication of evidence at preliminary hearings, which are held
to determine if the Crown's case is strong enough to take to
trial.
However, Hathway wants the
media to have the unfettered right to report the evidence. He
asked the judge not to impose the ban.
The Crown, meanwhile, did ask
for the ban and it was granted.
Crown prosecutor Brent Klause
said it's to protect Hathway's right to a fair trial.
Hathway's lawyer Robert Borden
told reporters Hathaway wants to bring police investigative techniques
under scrutiny.
He said sometimes police use
deception, manipulation and coercion to extract confessions and
some of those confessions turn out to be false.
The judge in the case said
she imposed the ban to err on the side of caution.
Accused wants reported
evidence
Publication ban imposed on details, officers' identities
Darren Bernhardt, The
StarPhoenix, July 27, 2005
A Saskatoon man facing a first-degree
murder charge tried in vain Tuesday to oppose a publication ban
on evidence in his upcoming preliminary hearing, going so far
as to shout objections from the prisoner's box.
Wilfred Gordon Hathway, 46,
insists he is innocent in the 1998 stabbing death of his former
landlord, Denver Bruce Crawford, 84. Hathway wants all evidence
to be widely reported because he feels the case against him is
weak and the public will learn how unconscionably the police
acted, says his lawyer Robert Borden.
"The public has a right
to know these things. It has a right to know the nature of these
(police procedures)," he said.
The ban, requested by Crown
prosecutor Brent Klause, was granted by provincial court Judge
Sheila Whelan. Klause argued the ban was in Hathway's best interests.
He might later feel his case
was prejudiced by certain information being released.
"(The ban) is designed
to protect the rights of the accused, whether he likes it or
not," said Klause.
"That's absolutely ludicrous,"
Hathway shouted, then asked Whelan if he could address the court.
She advised him to speak to
Borden. He did, but two more outbursts prompted Whelan to lose
patience.
"Would you listen to me?
My personal preference is that you speak to your counsel,"
she said.
Whelan also ordered Hathway
to lower his voice as he spoke in a loud volume to Borden.
"He simply wants the information
published," Borden told Whelan. "The more information
that gets out, the better. There's a lot of reasons for that
and I'm sure that will come out to you during cross-examination."
Whelan agreed with Klause that
Hathway has no way to predict whether something might come out
that would make him feel his rights had been jeopardized.
"If I'm going to err,
I'm going to err on that side," she said, adding she has
never before encountered a situation such as this -- where the
accused is opposing the publication ban.
Normally, it is the defence
lawyer making the request.
Whelan also granted an interim
ban on identifying the investigating officers. That request was
made by Jeffrey Hayes, a lawyer representing the investigating
police service, which arrested Hathway in another province in
May 2004.
Hayes' application comes under
a relatively new section of the Criminal Code. It was added following
the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States. The
purpose is to protect witnesses and justice system personnel
from identification in sensitive operations.
Whelan granted a temporary
ban until Aug. 23, when arguments can be made on the rationale
of that second ban.
"The right to report will
be decided at that time by the judge hearing the application,"
said Borden. "The media people will have the right to have
their own representatives there to make arguments as to what
may or may not be reported on."
In the meantime, Hathway's
preliminary hearing -- to determine if there is enough evidence
to proceed to a full trial -- will begin this morning. It was
scheduled to start Tuesday but was sidetracked by the lengthy
discussions about the bans.
"I regret the time that
has been taken by what I thought was a relatively harmless application,"
Hayes told Whelan.
Speaking to media outside the
courthouse, Borden was perturbed by the bans.
"There seems to be an
order here, there and everywhere prohibiting the media and prohibiting
the accused and others from disseminating any information. I
can't tell you very much, other than what you've read in the
newspaper (Tuesday) morning," he said.
The StarPhoenix published a
story about Hathway and his arrest in May 2004 prior to the ban
being granted.
"This is a situation where
we have to be tightlipped about everything," Borden added.
"We live in a democratic society, a constitutional society,
and we like to see information disseminated as much as possible
so that people can talk about the case, witnesses can come forth
and we can all get a better understanding in the sense of what's
right and just.
"We just cannot have secrecy.
We cannot have a situation where we're afraid to talk to each
other about cases. My God, didn't that happen in the Klassen-Kvello
case? Didn't it happen in the Martensville case? Didn't it happen
in Milgaard?" Borden added. "This has got to stop and
I hope it stops with this case, because it certainly didn't stop
with those others."
In late 2003, a social worker,
police officer and Crown prosecutor were all found liable in
Saskatoon for the malicious prosecution of 12 members of the
Klassen and Kvello families. One of the vindicated, Richard Klassen,
is attending court to support Hathway.
"If the police had evidence
against my client in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, or 2002, why didn't
they charge him then?" said Borden. "What was it that
happened in 2003 and 2004 that led to these charges?"
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2005
Publication ban sought
in murder case
Justice wants identities of officers kept secret
Darren Bernhardt, The
StarPhoenix, Tuesday, July 26, 2005
A lawyer for the federal Justice
Department appears today before a provincial court judge in Saskatoon,
seeking a publication ban on the identities of RCMP undercover
officers involved in a 1998 murder case.
The matter emerged after an
Internet website published the name and video image of one officer
who was part of a sting operation on Wilfred Gordon Hathway,
the prime suspect in the murder of Denver Bruce Crawford, 84.
The proposed ban applies to
all media outlets, including those on the Internet.
Hathway, 46, was arrested by
Kamloops RCMP in early May 2004 on a Canada-wide warrant for
first-degree murder. He was living in Crawford's Saskatoon rooming
house when the man was stabbed to death in May 1998.
Hathway reported finding Crawford's
body and became a suspect during the initial investigation. Only
last year did police determine there was enough evidence to proceed
with charges.
Website operator Sheila Steele
said she posted one RCMP officer's identity because she believes
Hathway was "the victim of an unethical sting." Her
Saskatoon-based website monitors perceived miscarriages of justice
around the world.
There is strong evidence Hathway
is innocent, insisted Steele, who became involved "in a
very roundabout way." A friend of Hathway's in Kamloops
e-mailed Steele. It wasn't until September that Steele and Hathway
began communicating directly. She took photographs of the undercover
officer from a videotape made during the sting. It allegedly
shows Hathway confessing to the killing.
RCMP claim Hathway confessed
several times but the recording equipment malfunctioned, Steele
said.
"The one they finally
extract from him is full of false details which do not in any
way correspond to the details of the initial investigation,"
she said.
Hathway has been in the Saskatoon
Correctional Centre since his arrest more than a year ago. His
preliminary hearing will begin today, after the publication ban
hearing.
Steele has removed the officer's
video image and changed his name in the website posting until
the issue is addressed in court.
The biggest injustice is how
Hathway was trapped by RCMP during the sting, said Steele.
"There is a lot to indicate
these (police) operatives are getting pretty reckless and have
to be stopped," she said. "But I think, ultimately,
it's in the public interest to know how these things go because
the cops broke so many laws themselves. I think the public interest
trumps the undercover (officer's) right to privacy.
"But if there's a chance
this has put (the officer) at any kind of risk, I don't want
to be involved. Frankly I don't think it is, so let's have it
out in court."
"I'm having a hard time
understanding (the website's) motive," Cpl. Tom Seaman,
of the RCMP strategic communications division in British Columbia.
"We don't do this to just
everybody. This is a technique used to catch dangerous, serious
offenders. And we have to protect the identification of the undercover
police officers because this is a very dangerous, dangerous job."
Hathway's Saskatoon lawyer,
Robert Borden, claims his client was coerced into illegal activities
by the undercover officers and his participation was used against
him to pry out a confession.
"When you don't have any
evidence against somebody what do you do? You try to extort a
confession, force a confession, use coercion and threats. I'm
not sure that's what we should do in a democratic society,"
said Borden, who will challenge the publication ban at today's
hearing.
"We do not want the media
prohibited from reporting on the proceedings. The way it is worded,
it even prohibits defence counsel from speaking about it if something
'tends' to reveal the identities. Lots of things will 'tend'
to do that. I won't give his name or a physical description but
I intend to talk as much as possible about this."
Steele said Hathway was an
alcoholic in 1998 when he stumbled into the rooming house and
found Crawford's body. After the initial investigation revealed
little evidence to charge him, Hathway moved to Kamloops and
became a student at Kamloops College.
He was close to receiving a
degree, had married and was a new father. He was working as a
janitor, living on a limited budget and caring for his family,
according to Steele.
One day a female undercover
officer knocked at his door, alleging she had car trouble and
needed help. Hathway was introduced to her "boyfriend,"
another undercover agent posing as a criminal with connections
to a big-time crime boss. Using a profile the RCMP had of Hathway,
they tempted him with promises of money and took him to bars,
plying him with liquor.
"The only way they could
get to this guy was to play on his vices. That's what I find
really egregious," said Steele. "Once Wilf was off
the wagon, he was off (and) he was gradually sucked into activities
he was aware were criminal."
Hathway was asked to go across
the U.S. border to retrieve a shipment of M-16 weapons but refused,
so the officers had to do it themselves to maintain their facade.
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2005
|
Truth can never be
told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd. William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell
