|
Las
Vegas Prosecutors | Thomas
L. Goldstein
Judge Opens Secret D.A.
Records to Scrutiny
By Henry Weinstein, LA Times
Staff Writer
A Los Angeles federal judge
has opened the door for defense attorneys to conduct a potentially
significant investigation of secret records on the district attorney's
unethical use of jailhouse informants in the 1970s and '80s,
legal experts said.
U.S. District Judge A. Howard
Matz ruled that attorneys for Thomas L. Goldstein could investigate
charges of widespread corruption in the district attorney's use
of such informants. Goldstein - who spent 24 years wrongfully
imprisoned on murder charges, partly on the word of a jailhouse
informant - filed a civil rights lawsuit against Los Angeles
County and Long Beach after he was freed last year.
Matz emphasized in his ruling that Goldstein's case "does
not focus on a violation limited to one actual prosecution."
"Plaintiff claims that
decades-long operations of the largest prosecutor's office in
the United States violated constitutional rights of many individuals,"
Matz wrote. "The practices consisted of failing to provide
required ethical supervision and discipline; creating barriers
to the dissemination of information within its ranks; assigning
personnel in a manner that perpetuated these violations; and
ignoring findings of an investigative body."
After problems with jailhouse
informants erupted in 1988, a special county grand jury was convened,
which two years later issued a report saying that the district
attorney's office had "failed to fulfill the ethical responsibilities
required of a public prosecutor."
The investigation, which showed
that prosecutors frequently presented the same dubious informants
in multiple cases without telling defense attorneys, led to a
significant reduction in their use.
But the district attorney failed
to ensure that all attorneys in the office shared information
about deals they had cut to persuade informants to testify, Goldstein's
lawyers charged in their suit. Goldstein also said prosecutors
had exhibited a pattern of presenting false confessions obtained
by jailhouse informants.
Gigi Gordon, the Los Angeles
defense attorney who played a critical role in unearthing the
way jailhouse informants were used in the 1970s and '80s, said,
"There is documentation about this which I have seen that
it was quite deliberate" that the district attorney's office
avoided setting up a system to distribute information about rewards
for jailhouse informants.
"It was understood that
if they did do it, they would have to give up a huge amount of
information," Gordon said.
Prosecutors by law must disclose
to the defense all exculpatory information, and, since a 1972
Supreme Court ruling, have been required to reveal any benefits
given in exchange for informants' testimony.
Sandi Gibbons, a spokeswoman
for Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley, declined to comment on the ruling,
except to say, "We would defer to our attorneys on this,
the county counsel.''
Deputy County Counsel Roger
Granbo said the county is thinking about an appeal.
Pasadena attorney Ronald O.
Kaye, Goldstein's lead lawyer, said he was very pleased with
Matz's "courageous" ruling. Kaye said he and his colleagues
would pursue extensive discovery that he believed would reveal
heretofore undisclosed information about the use of jailhouse
informants at the time of Goldstein's case and afterward.
Long Beach police officers
arrested Goldstein in November 1979 on suspicion of the shotgun
slaying of John McGinest. Goldstein was prosecuted by Deputy
Dist. Atty. Timothy Browne, who has since retired.
Goldstein's conviction was
based largely on the testimony of an eyewitness who later recanted
and of a jailhouse informant who a judge later said "fits
the profile of the dishonest jailhouse informant."
A Marine veteran who served
in Vietnam, Goldstein, now 56, maintained from the start that
he was innocent. He was released 16 months ago after five federal
judges ruled that his constitutional rights had been violated.
A state court judge dismissed the charges against him "in
furtherance of justice."
That judge cited a lack of
evidence against Goldstein and the "cancerous nature"
of the case.
Prosecutors sat mute in the
courtroom during Goldstein's trial when jailhouse informant Edward
F. Fink lied in testifying that he was getting nothing in return
for his testimony, court records show.
In reality, Fink received significant
benefits for his testimony, a point emphasized by federal judges
who overturned Goldstein's conviction. Prosecutors dropped one
case against Fink and reduced charges in another. Fink, who had
three felony convictions and a heroin habit, was arrested at
least 35 times, including 14 times in Long Beach. He died in
1994.
Goldstein asserted in his civil
rights suit that the district attorney had violated his constitutional
rights by having a policy and practice of "using confessions
obtained by jailhouse informants which were false and fabricated."
The suit also contended that
the district attorney's office had a policy of "failing
to disseminate" information within the office "about
the benefits jailhouse informants receive in exchange for assistance
in securing convictions."
Goldstein's attorneys also
asserted that the county "failed to create a system and
failed to train deputy district attorneys who handle jailhouse
informants" despite being aware of "the obvious risks
of not creating such a system."
Moreover, the suit alleged
that in the late 1970s, before Goldstein's prosecution and 1980
conviction, "two prosecutorial agencies conducted inquiries
into claims by a jailhouse informant that he knew of improper
conduct by" district attorney's office personnel "with
regard to confessions allegedly made to a jailhouse informant."
Those inquiries and the conclusions
that the agencies reached were "never indexed or widely
distributed" within the district attorney's office, "and
subsequently the informant served repeatedly as a witness in
criminal trials." The informants were not identified in
the suit.
Even before Goldstein was prosecuted,
his attorneys asserted, the district attorney's office "considered
the creation of a system to track the benefits provided to jailhouse
informants and other impeachment information, but no such system
was instituted."
"This has far-reaching
implications," said Loyola University law professor Laurie
Levenson, a former federal prosecutor who sat on a blue-ribbon
commission that reviewed the operations of the district attorney's
office in the mid-1990s.
Matz's ruling could "really
shake things up" in the district attorney's office, she
said. "This is open season on looking into how they handle
disclosure and other ethical issues."
Gordon said she had once obtained
a court order that gave her access to secret information grand
jurors saw when they were investigating jailhouse informants.
But before she could look at it, prosecutors dismissed the case
against her client.
"There is information
in transcripts sitting in a safe that is relevant to the claims
in this case," Gordon said. Matz's ruling, she said, gives
Goldstein's lawyers "a clear shot" at obtaining that
material.
In another part of his ruling,
Matz dismissed claims that Deputy Dist. Attys. Ann Ingalls and
Patrick Connolly kept Goldstein incarcerated after a federal
appeals court ordered him released pending a possible retrial.
Matz ruled that the prosecutors were immune from the suit.
|
Truth can never be
told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd. William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell
Truth suppress'd, whether
by courts or crooks, will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com
If you hold the mouth
of Truth, It will burst out its rib-cage. Somali proverb
Publisher : Sheila
Steele
Got something
to say about this or any other stories on this site? Go to injusticebustersblog Participate!
- injusticebusters
court advice :
- How to walk yourself through the justice system
-
- Why you should dump your preliminary hearing (written July 1998 and still valid)
-
- Sermonette:
The
Naked Truth -- (You
will find links to many more sermonettes in the sidebar on this
page
Another target
of Dueck's malice: : Wilf Hathway
Our activism
contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the
civil trial.
Index
to the stories on this website
This is not
regularly updated so if you are looking for a particular story
and you have a name or keyword, please use the site search engine(at
the bottom of the page) which IS regularly updated
Index to Saskatoon Police stories
This is a pretty good scrapbook
for the 1998-2002 period.

Inquiry into the malicious prosecution of David
Milgaard untanling 36 years of Saskatchewan police and Crown
misconduct: : Opening day 1 | 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 | 6
| 7 |
- Stephen
Williams: Canadian
writer subject to Stasi-like treatment by Canadian police
- Terry
Arnold: : Snitch a
suicide?
- RCMP
scenario stings: Brian
Hutchinson starts digging
- Gary
wells: Faulty eye-witness
testimony
- Tulia,
Texas
- Gilmer,
Texas
- Willie
Upshaw
- Wrongfully convicted in Canada
- Foster Parent false accusations
- Martensville
- Don
Smith obscenity trial: an obscene conviction
- James
Lockyer
- Hurricane
Carter
- Johnny Cochran speaks up for
Bill Sampson
- Vopnis
- Abdulai
Mohamed
- Nfld Defamation story:
- Wanda
Young
- Racism
in the Federal Civil Service

The Terrible Story behind the Atif Rafay and
Sebastian Burns convictions

Trial
set for June 15
We
know part of this disclosure is a forged statement and perjured
affidavit from a Winnipeg cop
-
-
-
-

The
Crown is still fighting Fred Poirier -- and they are losing.
Secret Commissions Case from Northern B.C.
-
-
- 2005: In
the United States the proven wrongful convictions just keep coming
at us!
-
- Brandon Morin:
- Convicted in Oregon
- of rapes which did not happen
- This website has good information
about Measure 11 -- Oregon's Mandatory Sentencing requirements
which have been in place since 1994. In this case we see how
the combination of a flawed grand jury system and prosecutors
who seek not justice but convictions is a recipe for wrongful
convictions.
-
Canadians who
have been wrongfully convicted because of improper investigations
combined with zealous Crown
A round-up of wrongful convictions in Canada
- Robert
Baltovich
- Michael Burns
- Sebastian Burns
- Rodney
Cain
- Wilbert
Coffin
(hanged, 1953)
- Jason
Dix
- Jim
Driskell
- Jody
Druken
- Randy
Druken
- Hugues
Duguay
- Michel Dumont
- Peter
Frumusa
- Walter
Gillespie and Robert Mailman
- Clayton Johnson
- Yvonne Johnson
- Herman
Kaglik
- Darren
Koehn
- Kulaveeringsam
"Kulam" Karthiresu
- Stephen Leadbeater
- Donald Marshall
- Chris McCullough
- Michael
McTaggart
- Felix
Michaud
- David Milgaard
- Guy
Paul Morin
- Shannon
Murrin
- Jamie
Nelson
- Greg
Parsons
- Benoit Proulx
- Atif Rafay
- Louise
Reynolds
- Thomas
Sophonow
- Gary
Staples
- Billy
Taillefer
- Steven
Truscott
- Joe
Warren
- Leon
Walchuk
-
- AIDWYC
- Innocence Project (Canada)
- Innocence Project (U.S.)
- Northwest Law Center on Wrongful Convictions
-
- Kirstin Lobato
- Jeffrey
Scott Hornoff
- Willie
Upshaw
- Hurricane
Carter
- Guildford
4
- Birmingham
6
- Amirault
- Houston
- U.S. wrongful convictions:
Exonerateed
- Kirk
Bloodsworth
- Laurence
Adams
- Ludrate
Burton
- Stephen
Cowans
- Wilton
Dedge
- Albert
Johnson
- Kenneth
Marsh
- Dwayne
McKinney
- James Bernard Parker
- Peter
Reilly
- Peter
Rose
- Sylvester
Smith
- Clifford
St. Joseph
- John
Stoll
- Marty
Tankleff
- Wilton
Dedge
- Ray
Krone
-
- Still working on it:
- Dennis Deschaine
- Dennis
Perry
- Tim
Sandfort
-
-
|
Revitalizing the
archives
From 1998 until
2002, injusticebusters was in the throes of identity crisis.
What was it? What were we doing? We grappled with editorial policy
at the same time we were learning the nuts and bolts of building
and posting a website. Once we had a secure, paid site I had
full editorial control, although I talked regularly to Richard
Klassen who was forced to move his family several times and did
not always have access to the internet. Rick's pages: one | two
We posted our
earliest and later actions.
Early versions
of the site can be found on the Wayback Machine.
I began following
other threads to stories of police and prosecutorial misconduct
and the site's character took on another facet: a newsclipping
scrapbook where stories could live longer than they would in
print form. I also began picking up other stories of wrongfully
convicted people. It was an explosion. By 2003 there were over
700 pages. I also had contact with several other people (Don Smith, Leon Walchuk, Monique Turenne, the Vopnis) and kept these stories
going.
It was the
story of the Ross children's treatment at the hands of the Saskatchewan
government which grabbed the attention of The
Fifth Estate.
The civil claim (The $10M Lawsuit as we called it) was only mentioned
briefly at the end of their show which aired in November, 2000.
When Richard
Klassen began to make progress in bringing his civil claim to
court, the government and police defendants alleged he was breaking
the rules of court by publishing discovery material on the internet.
- MacNeil clinic (the document which started it all)
- The Thompson Papers
- Carol
Bunko-Ruys reports
This claim
was absolutely false. However, rather than risk being thrown
out of his civil claim, Klassen undertook before Judge Mona Dovall
to sever all ties with the website.
The court fights:
- Les
Perreaux report
- QB271
These pages have links which
lead to other pages from that era. Now that some of the dust has settled,
I have been going back through the material we had posted in
the early days. In the spirit of keeping the scrapbook alive,
I have been reformatting and placing links. The original material
remains intact. I hope the information, which chronicles our
struggle is useful to you.
The identity
crisis is over. We know who we are --Sheila Steele, March
28, 2005
|
-
Blogging
Blogging has been in the news.
It is the new, trendy thing with 40,000 new blogs being created
each day. I established a blog for this website last September
and it is now "taking off." These are a few of the
pages with ongoing discussions.
- Tasering Mary Lutz
- Saskatchewan Centenary
- Quint Blog discussion
- Rotten apples in the Saskatoon Police
- Blogging for choice
- Michael Cardamone witch hunt
- Implement recommendations of public
inquiries
- Stealing from the poor
- Vancouver's killer cops
- Tisdale rapists appeal
- Winnipeg police misdeeds
- Milgaard Inquiry
- Chief Sabo: can he be trusted?
- The Old Boys' Club Must Go!
- Vancouver activists
- John Hudak: Falsely accused mountie
- City of intolerance
- Constable Larry Lockwood: Exciteable!
- Eric Cline
This is a great way for like-minded
people to communicate and share our views. It is easier than
making a website and marginally more difficult than a forum.
People who want to contribute
simply have to punch the "comment" link and they will
be taken to a page with a box which allows them to write their
comment, preview and post it. It takes a while for the comment
to show up and some people get impatient and repost. That's fine,
I trash the duplicate posts and no harm done.
Please, please give it a try.
The internet is distinguished from other media in that it is
really and truly interactive. Blogging makes it possible to express
your viewpoint even if you don't have a computer. You can go
to the library or a friend's place or an internet cafe. Once
you've mastered the basics (and believe me, if I can do it, you
can do it) you will be participating in one of the most democratic
-- and potentially powerful -- media the world as we know it
has ever seen.
Come on. Don't be shy. Join
the Weblog World! -- Sheila Steele, March 20, 2005
Toronto
Police paid out $30M in secretly resolved claims over last five
years
|