A living scrapbook of injustices in progress and the tools to set them right
Restoring reputations to the defamed -- Telling the truth about the undefamable

The Reid technique | Farand Bear trial | John Chalmers in Sarnia | Monique Turenne | Big Boss stings by Brian Hutchinson | Informants | False confessions | Fingerprinting | Confessions | CSI Effect | Forensic labs | Bullet Bullshit | Forensics: Chicago |


RCMP may review interrogation methods after Bear acquittal
Judge tosses confession in Wapass murder case

Betty Ann Adam, The StarPhoenix, December 09, 2004

The RCMP will wait to see if the Crown appeals Farand Bear's acquittal on a manslaughter charge before considering whether interrogation methods need to be reviewed, RCMP spokesperson Cpl. Brian Jones said Wednesday.

Bear was acquitted in the 2002 death of Maxine Wapass on Tuesday, after Queen's Bench Justice John Klebuc refused to admit a videotaped confession because police interrogators violated Bear's right to remain silent.

Klebuc had found that RCMP Sgt. Charles Lerat and Saskatoon Police Service Const. Stan Goertzen "went too far" when they suggested to Bear the court would interpret his refusal to answer questions as a lack of remorse.

Bear said 88 times over three days of questioning in June 2003 that he couldn't answer their questions on the advice of his lawyer.

If the Crown does not appeal the decision, the police may review interrogation procedures, Jones said.

Lerat and Goertzen are qualified polygraph operators, which required training in interviewing and interrogation at the Canadian Police College in Ottawa, so Klebuc's criticism of their method "could have wider implications," Jones said.

On the other hand, judges make decisions every day "on the voluntariness" of statements and this ruling may not be enough to require changing the way police are taught, he said.

Sometimes investigators don't have enough evidence to charge a suspect with a crime, said Bernie Eisworth, executive officer of the Saskatchewan Federation of Police Officers. In such cases, a confession may be an investigator's last hope of proving who committed the crime, he said.

"The easy thing would have been to say, 'We have nothing,' and go home," he said. "Maybe they feel a little desperate."

The decision to reject the statement based on the police comments and behaviour rests with the judge. Another judge might have ruled differently, Eisworth said.

The public can take comfort in knowing interrogations are videotaped so that if police do make mistakes in questioning, the errors can be caught and police can learn from them, Eisworth said.

"That's the way it has to be. As police officers, we have to accept that," he said.
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2004


Truth can never be told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd. William Blake, The Proverbs of Hell

Truth suppress'd, whether by courts or crooks, will find an avenue to be told. Sheila Steele, injusticebusters.com

If you hold the mouth of Truth, It will burst out its rib-cage. Somali proverb


Publisher : Sheila Steele

Got something to say about this or any other stories on this site? Go to injusticebustersblog Participate!

injusticebusters court advice :
How to walk yourself through the justice system
 
Why you should dump your preliminary hearing (written July 1998 and still valid)
 
Sermonette: The Naked Truth -- (You will find links to many more sermonettes in the sidebar on this page

Another target of Dueck's malice: Wilf Hathway

Our activism contributed greatly to the good vibes which happened around the civil trial.

 


 

How the mounties stung Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns


Home

Search for
© 2001 www.injusticebusters.com
E-mail injusticebusters

eXTReMe Tracker

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

April 27, 2005

-30-